So the brief for my first unit is one on the topic of Authorship.
What is an Author? Foucault might ask you.. How do we know an author? We can’t know what went on in someones head at the time of producing a text so why bother? We can take what we want from it then. While there is a lot more to it I think part of me would like to contest this?? While we can’t know ‘exactly’ what was in authors head we can have some clue as to what was going on.
The authors intentions are a straight line.. and while our understanding will next be exact we can sometimes get pretty close with our own lines that we draw. When I heard this view however it I couldn’t help but wonder over the ideological presuppositions such a theory would carry.. of course I don’t know Shakespeare personally or Plato or whoever.. but I had some sort of idea about what was being talked about when I had to read Shakespeare at school or read the Republic. Why? Well I could discuss it with others to see it my views matched up.. did I get the right idea or did I miss the point? While this is a form of ‘truth as the most popular consensus of the time’ this isn’t the only method. I know a fact can be a fact such as water is made up of a couple of hydrogen molecules coupled with a single oxygen molecule.. now if someone wrote that in a book.. how do you know if I was right? or if I was wrong? You could go find out for yourself..
Aristotle was known to say
“To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not, is true”
And Thomas Aquinas likewise
“A judgment is said to be true when it conforms to the external reality”
But yeah.. I dunno, I sort of enjoy this.. it’s my favorite part of the course really. I’ve heard some critiques of the correspondence notion of truth but I’ve still got to read into them in some depth yet. We’re not perfect but like with most scientific findings.. the more they are independently tested as theories (or on the other hand the more we realize isn’t right) the more believable the said notion of truth is said to be.
Anyway! Phew
My new brief set by the neighborhood ideological state apparatus is to design a social networking site like facebook and I’m going to take a go at this whole U8 thing I’ve been mentioning.. the sky is the limit with that idea as it could just keep getting built upon. Yet I’m going to try and break it down to make something people can pitch ideas for research on areas in the 3rd world and comment on. I’m hoping to set up user accounts and a moderation feature so people don’t write.. crap up basically. But it quickly gets complicated and I’m still learning a lot with php (the code required) as it goes at the moment..
I designed the front end at least ready to be cut up in photoshop I would upload it but my image host is being a pain and I can’t access it.. so maybe I’ll show you later? I’ve also been looking at a lot of sites in the way that help deal with the whole barrier between the first and third world in the internet. All this web 2.0 stuff is fine if you got broadband.. but otherwise you just arn’t going to get anywhere. My target audience ideally should be world wide.. so how does my website cater for those who have a 20k dial-up connection from their university in Africa?
This is something really interesting I find and would like to follow up.. the site www.aptivate.org has alot on this and it’d be quite interesting to see how this effects my project!


to those who live in the ‘ghetto’ around it. It’s basically about.. communal living, charity, working out social justice, ethical standards and I guess actually taking what Jesus said a little bit more literally than some other folks had done in the past. I found it challenging but it was nice to read about a Christian who didn’t come across as some mystical nutter or some bible bashing republican. He lived with Mother Teresa and worked briefly in a leprosy colony in Calcutta before going over to Iraq, taking part in the battle of Baghdad.. as a civilian and connecting with the native Christians and church of the country who have been around since.. well close to 2000 years I guess. He does a lot of stuff like Desmond Tutu in trying to build bridges between Americans and Iraqis.. the cool thing was apparently that all the money off his book goes to everyone mentioned in the book.